In 3–5 sentences, compare the Eastern and Western Fronts of World War I in terms of their geography and strategies.(4 points) Short Answer Rubric (4 points) Points Awarded Criteria 4 The answer is very clear. The answer is fully supported by details. There may be a few errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics. Errors do not interfere with meaning. 3 The answer is mostly clear. The answer is supported by mostly relevant details. There are a few errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics. Errors do not interfere with meaning. 2 The answer is somewhat clear. Details are weak or not related. There are some errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics. Errors interfere with meaning. 1 The answer is not clear. There are few or no supporting details. There are many errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics. Errors interfere with meaning. 0 The question is not answered.
The Eastern Front of World War I covered a vast stretch of land, from the Baltic Sea in the north to the Black Sea in the south. It was characterized by fluid and mobile warfare, with both sides trying to outflank each other through large-scale maneuvers. Strategies on the Eastern Front also involved attempts to break through the enemy lines and seize key cities or territories. In contrast, the Western Front was a stalemate characterized by trench warfare. It spanned a shorter distance and had more fortified positions, leading to static and attritional strategies focused on breaking through the enemy's trenches.
