Which of the plans for distributing power among and between levels of government would best address Madison argument
Madison's argument for distributing power among and between levels of government was to prevent the concentration of power in a single entity or group. He believed in a system of checks and balances that would ensure the protection of individual rights and prevent tyranny.
One plan that would best address Madison's argument is a federal system of government. In a federal system, power is divided between a national government and regional or state governments. This division of power allows for more local control, while still maintaining a centralized authority.
Under a federal system, the national government would have specific powers delegated to it by the constitution, such as defense, currency, and foreign policy. The state governments, on the other hand, would have powers that are not specifically delegated to the national government, known as reserved powers. These powers could include education, transportation, and public health.
This plan would address Madison's argument because it ensures that power is dispersed among different levels of government. It prevents the accumulation of too much power in the hands of one entity, and allows for a system of checks and balances to be maintained. Additionally, it allows for more localized decision making, tailoring policies to the unique needs and preferences of different regions.
Overall, a federal system of government would best address Madison's argument by distributing power among and between levels of government, preventing the concentration of power and safeguarding individual rights.