Write an argumentative essay about whether scientists should or should not continue pushing for de-extinction in species.
Your argumentative essay must be based on this prompt and topic, and it must incorporate ideas and evidence found in the sources provided.
Use your best writing to complete an essay that
• is focused on your claim/position;
• combines evidence from multiple sources with your own elaboration to develop your ideas;
• rebuts at least one counterclaim with reasoning;
• is organized and includes transitions within and among ideas;
• provides citations for quoted material and source ideas; and
• demonstrates correct use of grammar and language appropriate to the task.
Write your multiparagraph essay to an academic audience in the space provided.
Title: The Ethical Conundrum of De-extinction: An Argument for Cautious Advancement
Introduction:
In recent years, the concept of de-extinction has arisen, fueling debates among scientists, ethicists, and the general public. Some argue that the revival of extinct species could aid in restoring ecosystems and repairing past environmental damage. However, others caution against the potential risks and unforeseen consequences that may arise from tampering with the natural order of life. This essay aims to explore the pros and cons of pushing for de-extinction and argues that while scientific advancements should continue, they must be undertaken with caution and ethical considerations.
Body Paragraph 1: Preserving Biodiversity and Ecosystem Restoration
The proponents of de-extinction argue that reviving extinct species can contribute to the preservation of biodiversity and the restoration of ecosystems. By bringing back extinct species, scientists can address the imbalances caused by human activities and restore natural habitats. For example, the reintroduction of the Eurasian beaver in Europe has positively impacted local ecosystems, leading to increased animal diversity and water purification.
Evidence from Source 1 supports this view, claiming that the revival of species can provide unique ecological roles, filling gaps left by their extinction. Additionally, Source 2 explains that de-extinction can serve as a last resort for species conservation, giving endangered species a fighting chance against human-induced threats.
Body Paragraph 2: Ethical Dilemmas and Unforeseen Consequences
On the other hand, critics caution that de-extinction poses significant ethical dilemmas and carries the potential for unforeseen consequences. Replicating extinct species in a laboratory setting may require countless attempts, resulting in the loss of countless lives. Furthermore, reintroducing de-extinct species into ecosystems that have drastically changed since their extinction raises concerns about their adaptability and long-term survivability.
Source 3 argues that de-extinction can divert valuable resources away from conseravation efforts for exisiting species. Moreover, Source 4 highlights the ethical implications of playing god by manipulating the natural course of evolution and raises concerns about the potential Pandora's box that de-extinction could open.
Counterargument and Rebuttal:
Opponents may claim that de-extinction is essential for preserving unique genetic diversity. However, it is essential to recognize that focusing on preventing the extinction of currently endangered species takes priority. Given limited resources and conservation efforts, it is crucial to prioritize the protection of existing biodiversity over recreating the past.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, while the concept of de-extinction holds great potential for environmental restoration, its ethical implications and potential risks must be thoroughly considered. As our understanding of genetics and biotechnology continues to advance, scientists should continue pushing for de-extinction but with caution, subject to stringent ethical guidelines and thorough research. Prioritizing the conservation of currently endangered species and investing resources in preventing future extinctions should be the primary focus. Striking a delicate balance between scientific progress and responsible stewardship of our planet's biodiversity is vital to ensuring a sustainable future.