Why do southerners resist the increased tariff in 1828 arguing it should be nullified it was not helpful to any section of the country it benefited one section of the country at the expense of another it increased the market of forgotten it increased foreign competition
Southerners resisted the increased tariff in 1828 and argued for its nullification for several reasons.
Firstly, they believed that the tariff was not helpful to any section of the country. Southerners primarily relied on agricultural exports, particularly cotton, for their economic prosperity. The increased tariff threatened to raise the prices of imported goods, including manufactured goods from the northern states, which would negatively impact the southern economy.
Secondly, southerners argued that the tariff benefited one section of the country at the expense of another. The northern states, which had a more developed manufacturing industry, stood to benefit from the tariff as it would protect their industries from foreign competition. On the other hand, the southern states, which had a more agrarian economy, would face higher costs for imported goods without benefiting from increased protection for their industries.
Additionally, the increased tariff also increased the market for forgotten industries in the northern states. This meant that industries that had been struggling or were previously reliant on foreign imports would now have a domestic market to sell their goods to, while southern industries were left at a disadvantage.
Lastly, the higher tariff also increased foreign competition for southern agricultural exports. In retaliation for the increased tariff, foreign countries imposed their own tariffs on American goods, making it harder for southern farmers to sell their products abroad. This further undermined the southern economy and aggravated the resistance to the tariff.
In summary, southerners resisted the increased tariff in 1828 and argued for its nullification because they believed it was not beneficial to any section of the country, disproportionately benefited the northern states, increased foreign competition for southern industries, and negatively impacted southern agricultural exports.