caucalate 2H2(g) O2(g)-->2h2o(I)
To calculate the reaction, we need to balance the equation first. Let's balance the equation:
2H2(g) + O2(g) --> 2H2O(l)
The balanced equation indicates that 2 moles of hydrogen gas (H2) react with 1 mole of oxygen gas (O2) to produce 2 moles of water (H2O).
If you want to calculate the stoichiometry of the reaction, you can use the following conversion factors:
1 mole of H2O is formed from 2 moles of H2.
1 mole of H2O is formed from 1 mole of O2.
So, if you have the given amount of H2 or O2, you can use these conversion factors to find the amount of water produced.
Write an essay in which you argue whether Chisholm or Obama makes a stronger argument for her or his candidacy.
Title: Evaluating the Strength of Arguments: Chisholm vs. Obama for their Candidacy
Introduction:
In the world of politics, the selection of a candidate for a significant leadership position relies heavily on their ability to communicate and present compelling arguments for their candidacy. Shirley Chisholm and Barack Obama have both made powerful cases for their suitability for the presidency. This essay aims to evaluate and compare their arguments, analyzing which candidate presents a stronger case for their candidacy.
Argument Analysis: Shirley Chisholm
Shirley Chisholm, the first African American woman elected to Congress, put forth a remarkable argument for her presidential candidacy in 1972. Chisholm advocated for gender equality, racial justice, and unity as key components of her campaign. She highlighted her experience and unyielding commitment to advocating for marginalized communities throughout her political career.
Chisholm's argument resonated strongly with those seeking to break barriers and smash gender and racial stereotypes. Her emphasis on representation and inclusivity struck a chord with many Americans who believed in the importance of diversity in leadership positions. By running for president, Chisholm's campaign also encouraged increased participation from underrepresented communities, signaling a significant shift toward more comprehensive political engagement.
Argument Analysis: Barack Obama
Barack Obama emerged on the political scene in 2007 with an inspiring argument encapsulating hope, unity, and change. Obama's campaign centered around his ability to bridge divides, mend partisan wounds, and tap into the aspirations of the American people. Promoting a sense of collective responsibility, Obama's platform emphasized the need for unity to achieve progress.
Obama's argument resonated with a nation weary of polarization and longing for a leader capable of fostering compromise. His emphasis on hope and his charismatic approach managed to inspire a broad base of supporters, transcending traditional divides. Obama's call for grassroots activism encouraged individuals to take ownership of their democracy, generating a powerful movement that propelled him to the presidency.
Comparative Evaluation:
Both Chisholm and Obama presented strong arguments for their respective candidacies, but certain factors lend strength to one over the other. Chisholm's historical significance as a trailblazer and her commitment to advocating for marginalized communities makes her argument compelling. However, in terms of broad appeal, Obama's argument for unity and change resonated with a diverse range of voters, ultimately leading to his successful presidency.
Obama's ability to articulate a unifying vision and his capacity to inspire and galvanize the masses propelled him to victory. His charisma and ability to connect with people remained unparalleled, aiding his campaign's effectiveness. Despite Chisholm's significant achievements and her status as a pioneering candidate, Obama's ability to mobilize and engage a broader spectrum of society gives his argument an edge in terms of overall strength.
Conclusion:
In evaluating the strength of arguments made by Shirley Chisholm and Barack Obama for their presidential candidacies, it becomes evident that the two candidates possessed distinct qualities and communicated compelling campaigns. While Chisholm's fight against gender and racial discrimination was extraordinary, Obama's ability to inspire a broad base of voters and his message of unity and change proved pivotal to his success.
Ultimately, the supremacy of an argument can be subjective to an individual's values and priorities. However, in terms of broad appeal, the ability to inspire collective action, and subsequent success, Barack Obama's argument for his candidacy emerges as stronger. Both candidates, however, undeniably played crucial roles in shaping the political landscape, leaving their indelible mark on American history.