Organizers at the state and local level identify that air pollution is responsible for higher incidences of lung cancer. The air pollution is traced to factories that employ a substantial number of state residents. Organizers, unable to coordinate a reduction in the industry’s pollution generation, ask state legislators for help. In the end, state legislators provide tax incentives for the company to retrofit their factories with green technology and reduce pollution emissions. Explain how civil society and institutions in this case are contributCivil society institutions interact with the business sphere through private governance.
Civil society institutions interact with the business sphere through private governance.
Civil society institutions interact with governmental and business spheres through network governance.
Civil society institutions interact with governmental and business spheres through network governance.
Civil society institutions interact with the governmental sphere through legal governance.
Civil society institutions interact with the governmental sphere through legal governance.
Governmental and business spheres interact through market governance.
Governmental and business spheres interact through market governance.ing to the public good.(1 point)
In this case, civil society institutions are contributing to the public good by recognizing and addressing the negative impacts of air pollution on public health. They are organizing and advocating for solutions to reduce pollution emissions from factories, which directly affects the health and well-being of state residents.
Civil society institutions are also engaging with businesses by requesting their cooperation in reducing pollution generation. In this case, organizers are unable to directly coordinate a reduction in pollution emissions, leading them to seek help from state legislators. This demonstrates the interaction between civil society institutions and the business sphere through private governance, as they are attempting to influence the actions of the company to prioritize public health and sustainability.
Additionally, civil society institutions are engaging with the governmental sphere through network governance. They are reaching out to state legislators for assistance in addressing the issue of air pollution. The state legislators then respond by providing tax incentives for the company to retrofit their factories with green technology and reduce pollution emissions. This showcases the interaction between civil society institutions and governmental institutions through network governance, as they collaborate and create networks to address public concerns.
Furthermore, civil society institutions interact with the governmental sphere through legal governance. They identify a problem, in this case, the higher incidences of lung cancer attributed to air pollution, and seek assistance through legal means. They advocate for policy changes and incentives to encourage businesses to take action in reducing pollution emissions. The tax incentives provided by state legislators in response to their request illustrate the influence and contribution of civil society institutions in shaping legal governance.
Overall, civil society institutions play a vital role in this case by recognizing the public health implications of air pollution and advocating for actions to reduce pollution emissions. They interact with the business and governmental spheres through private, network, and legal governance, ultimately contributing to the public good by working towards a healthier environment for state residents.