You find a blog post written by a student on a university website about photosynthesis, assess the reliability of the source.

It may be reliable because the blog has been featured on a popular website.
It may be reliable, because other students verify the information in the blog.
it may be reliable because they cited other students blogs.
It may be reliable because they say multiple peer reviewed studies from scientific journals.

The reliability of the source cannot be determined based on the given information. Although the fact that the blog has been featured on a popular website may indicate some level of credibility, it is not sufficient to fully assess the reliability. Similarly, while other students verifying the information is a positive aspect, it is still unclear how their verification process was conducted. The citation of other student blogs does not necessarily guarantee reliability as the information could be based on personal opinions or lack factual evidence. On the other hand, mentioning multiple peer-reviewed studies from scientific journals suggests a higher level of reliability, as these studies undergo rigorous review by experts in the field. However, to fully assess the source's reliability, it is necessary to further investigate the credibility of the blog author, their expertise in the subject matter, and the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the information provided.