Give me some scenario about red lie in question document examination
Scenario 1:
The document examiner, Dr. Smith, is presented with a case involving a potential red lie in a questioned document. The document in question is an employment application submitted by Mr. Johnson, who is being considered for a senior management position at a prestigious company. The issue raised is regarding his claim of having a doctorate degree in business administration from a renowned university.
Dr. Smith meticulously examines the document, paying close attention to the educational qualifications section. After scrutinizing various aspects, including ink analysis, handwriting style, and document layout, it becomes evident that the claimed doctorate degree is a red lie. Dr. Smith notices a discrepancy in the ink used for writing the doctoral information compared to the rest of the document. Further analysis of the handwriting reveals inconsistencies, indicating possible attempts to imitate someone else's handwriting.
To confirm these findings, Dr. Smith contacts the university mentioned on the application to verify Mr. Johnson's educational background. The university administration informs him that they have no record of Mr. Johnson attending or receiving a doctorate degree from their institution. The combination of handwriting inconsistencies, ink analysis, and confirmatory information from the university leads Dr. Smith to conclude that Mr. Johnson's claim of having a doctorate degree is a red lie.
Scenario 2:
In another scenario, the questioned document is a financial statement submitted by a company seeking investment from potential investors. The document examiner, Ms. Stevens, is tasked with evaluating the accuracy and reliability of the provided financial information.
While reviewing the document, Ms. Stevens notices anomalies in the reported revenue figures, specifically in the red lie scenario. As she analyzes the document, she identifies several irregularities, such as different handwriting styles and ink shades for certain sections of the financial statement. Additionally, the calculations and account balances seem inconsistent and incorrect, raising suspicions about the accuracy of the reported revenue.
To verify her suspicions, Ms. Stevens contacts the company's accountant to obtain the original financial records. Upon comparing the original records with the submitted financial statement, she discovers significant disparities. The revenue figures reported on the document do not match the actual financial records, indicating a deliberate red lie.
Based on these findings, Ms. Stevens concludes that the financial statement contains falsified revenue information, potentially serving as a red lie to deceive potential investors into believing the company is more profitable than it truly is.