Some experts argue in favor of class-based affirmative action. That is, giving people born to lower-class families an advantage in college admissions and company hiring. should the society do something like this? Why or why not?
The question of whether society should implement class-based affirmative action is a matter of ongoing debate. While some arguments in favor of this approach exist, it ultimately depends on individual perspectives and societal goals. Here is a balanced overview of the reasoning behind both sides:
Arguments in favor of class-based affirmative action:
1. Equalizing opportunities: Socioeconomic background often correlates with unequal access to quality education and resources. Implementing class-based affirmative action aims to address these disparities by giving individuals from lower-class families a better chance to access higher education or secure employment.
2. Diverse perspectives and experiences: Class-based affirmative action can address the lack of representation of lower-income individuals in elite academic institutions and high-paying jobs. By involving individuals from diverse backgrounds, it can foster a broader range of perspectives and experiences, improving the overall quality of education and workplace environments.
3. Breaking the cycle of poverty: Providing disadvantaged individuals with improved access to education and employment opportunities can help break the cycle of poverty. Through increased social mobility, individuals from lower-class families can have a better chance to advance economically, benefitting both themselves and society at large.
Arguments against class-based affirmative action:
1. Merit-based principles: Critics argue that class should not be a determinative factor in decision-making processes such as college admissions or hiring. They propose that individuals should be evaluated primarily based on their individual merits and qualifications, irrespective of socioeconomic background.
2. Overlooking individuality: Critics contend that class-based affirmative action overlooks the uniqueness and talents of individuals by prioritizing socioeconomic background. They argue that it may result in placing less-qualified individuals ahead of more deserving candidates, potentially harming the overall quality of education or workplace performance.
3. Focusing on socioeconomic class alone: Critics highlight that class-based affirmative action fails to account for other relevant factors, such as race or ethnicity, that also contribute to societal inequalities. They argue that addressing multiple forms of disadvantage simultaneously may be a more comprehensive approach to achieving equal opportunities.
Ultimately, the decision to implement class-based affirmative action should consider the specific societal context and goals. It is essential to strike a balance between addressing inequalities, promoting equal opportunities, and upholding principles of fairness and meritocracy.