Which of the following best fits the moral hazard problem of the R2P?
The responsibility to protect (R2P) is a principle that holds states responsible for protecting their populations from mass atrocities, such as genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity. It also allows for international intervention if a state fails to fulfill this responsibility.
The moral hazard problem of the R2P refers to the risk that states may neglect or fail to take proactive measures to protect their populations if they believe that the international community will intervene and protect them in case of crisis. In other words, it is the concern that the R2P may create a moral hazard by discouraging states from taking responsibility for the protection of their own citizens.
Among the options provided, the best fit for the moral hazard problem of the R2P would be:
- The possibility of states relying solely on external interventions without addressing the root causes of the conflict or crisis within their own borders.
This option captures the essence of the moral hazard problem by suggesting that states may neglect their responsibility to protect their populations if they believe that international interventions will be readily available. It highlights the risk of states relying solely on external help without addressing the underlying causes of the conflict or crisis. This can perpetuate a cycle of dependency and undermine the long-term effectiveness of the R2P.
Other options provided may be relevant to the R2P discussion, but they do not directly address the moral hazard problem.