How did Thomas Jefferson's view of the national debt differ from that of Alexander Hamilton?

Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton had starkly contrasting views when it came to the national debt. Here are the key differences in their perspectives:

1. Nature of the Debt: Hamilton believed that a national debt was a positive asset for the country. He saw it as a way to establish creditworthiness and build trust with both domestic and foreign investors. Jefferson, on the other hand, considered the national debt to be a burden. He equated debt with dependency and feared that it would give excessive power to the federal government.

2. Funding and Assumption: Hamilton proposed a plan to fund and assume the states' debts incurred during the Revolutionary War. This plan involved issuing federal bonds and consolidating the states' debts into a unified national debt. Hamilton believed it would set the stage for economic development and international credibility. Jefferson strongly opposed this plan, seeing it as unfair since some states had already paid their debt while others still had significant amounts outstanding.

3. Role of the Federal Government: Hamilton advocated for a strong central government that could actively intervene in the economy. He believed that the federal government should assume responsibility for paying off the national debt and use its powers to promote economic growth through financial institutions and industrial development. Jefferson, on the other hand, was wary of a powerful central government. He believed in limited government intervention and favored an agrarian society over industrialization.

4. Constitutional Interpretation: Hamilton interpreted the "necessary and proper" clause of the Constitution more broadly, allowing for a broader range of federal powers, including the assumption of state debts. Jefferson, however, had a strict interpretation of the Constitution, arguing that only explicitly stated powers should be granted to the federal government. This difference in interpretation had a significant impact on their views on government involvement in financial matters.

Overall, Hamilton believed that the national debt was necessary for the economic development and stability of the country, while Jefferson saw it as a threat to individual liberty and a restraint on states' rights.