According to these two perspectives, what was the churches view on effectiveness of feudalism in the needs of medieval society?
According to the two perspectives provided, the church's view on the effectiveness of feudalism in the needs of medieval society differed.
Perspective 1: The church supported and justified feudalism
Some members of the church believed that feudalism was an effective system that served the needs of medieval society. They argued that the hierarchical structure of feudalism provided stability and order, with lords protecting and providing for their vassals, and vassals offering service and loyalty in return. The church saw feudalism as a means to maintain social order and advocated for the idea of hierarchy as divinely ordained, where each person had a specific role and responsibility. According to this perspective, the church supported feudalism as a necessary system for the functioning of society.
Perspective 2: The church criticized feudalism
Other members of the church, particularly those who aligned with the ideals of Christian egalitarianism, criticized feudalism. They argued that feudalism perpetuated inequalities and hindered social progress. They believed that the focus of feudal society on land ownership and military prowess was contrary to the Christian values of compassion, justice, and equality. According to this perspective, the church emphasized the importance of the spiritual aspects of society, rather than the material and earthly power dynamics of feudalism.
Ultimately, it is important to note that the church was not a monolithic entity, and different individuals and factions within the church held varying views on feudalism.