Once the application is complete it needs to be deployed. Canteen management
wishes to follow a direct deployment approach.
Recommend and discuss an alternative approach to deployment and motivate
your answer by discussing why your recommended approach is better than the
direct deployment approach.
(6)
An alternative approach to deployment could be the phased deployment approach. This approach involves deploying the application in a series of smaller, incremental releases rather than deploying it all at once.
There are several reasons why the phased deployment approach may be better than the direct deployment approach in the case of canteen management:
1. Risk Mitigation: By deploying the application in phases, any potential issues or bugs can be identified and addressed early on. This allows for better risk mitigation as problems can be fixed before they impact the entire system. In contrast, a direct deployment approach leaves little room for error and any issues that arise may have a significant impact.
2. User Adoption: With a phased deployment approach, users have the opportunity to gradually adapt to and learn the new system. This can ensure a smoother transition and increase user satisfaction as they have time to understand and adjust to the changes. In a direct deployment approach, users may feel overwhelmed with a sudden change and this can negatively impact their experience.
3. Scalability: The phased deployment approach makes it easier to scale up the system gradually. As the application is released in smaller increments, it allows for continuous improvement and adaptation based on user feedback. This ensures that the system can be expanded and enhanced over time to meet changing needs and requirements. In a direct deployment approach, scalability may be more challenging as any necessary adjustments or enhancements may require a complete system overhaul.
4. Cost-effectiveness: The phased deployment approach can also be more cost-effective as it allows for adjusting resources and budgets based on the progress and feedback from each phase. This allows for better optimization of resources and avoids investing heavily in a complete system deployment without the certainty of its success. In a direct deployment approach, a significant investment may be required upfront without the opportunity for corrections or adjustments based on early feedback.
In conclusion, the phased deployment approach offers several advantages over the direct deployment approach in terms of risk mitigation, user adoption, scalability, and cost-effectiveness. By deploying the application in smaller increments, canteen management can better manage risks, ensure a smoother user transition, adapt the system as needed, and optimize resource allocation.