When considering releasing pet into the wild, it is important to take into consideration the potential negative effects on the environment. Domestic animals, such as cats, dogs, and birds, are not accustomed to living in the wild and often depend on humans for food, water, and shelter. Releasing them into the wild can lead to overcrowding in certain areas, increased competition for resources, and a decline in the health of native species. In addition, released pets may be more vulnerable to predation, disease, and parasites, and can also spread diseases to wildlife. For these reasons, anyone caught releasing pets into the wild should be penalized with a large fine.
How does the author support the claim that people who release pets into the wild should be punished?
1. by including evidence that shows that pets are more likely to thrive out in the wilderness
2. by including reasons that people might be tempted to release a pet into the wild
3. by including data that shows that the threat of punishment stops people from releasing pets
4. by including an example of how pets depend on humans
The author supports the claim that people who release pets into the wild should be punished by including an example of how pets depend on humans for food, water, and shelter. This supports the idea that releasing pets into the wild can lead to negative consequences for the environment and the pets themselves.
which of the 4 is correct
The correct answer is 4. by including an example of how pets depend on humans.
The author supports the claim that people who release pets into the wild should be punished by including an example of how pets depend on humans. This example highlights the fact that domestic animals, such as cats, dogs, and birds, are not accustomed to living in the wild and rely on humans for food, water, and shelter. By emphasizing this dependence, the author suggests that releasing pets into the wild is not only harmful to the pets themselves but also disrupts the natural balance of the environment.
