Source 1: Requiring school districts to recycle will reduce the emissions of greenhouses gases that damage the environment. School districts have many people in them and dispose of large amounts of waste. Their participation is necessary if recycling is going to have an impact on the environment. Source 2: Outside recycling programs can be expensive for schools that need to use their district's money for educational programs and resources. While recycling is important for protecting our planet, getting all students to follow a specific program is not easy and can cause programs to be ineffective. On which fact do the two sources disagree?
The two sources disagree on the impact and effectiveness of requiring school districts to recycle. Source 1 argues that requiring school districts to recycle will reduce greenhouse gas emissions and have a positive impact on the environment. Source 2, on the other hand, argues that getting all students to follow a specific recycling program is not easy and can cause programs to be ineffective, suggesting that requiring school districts to recycle may not be as effective as Source 1 suggests.
a; There is a need to protect the environment with recycling. b: Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people. c: Recycling programs in schools damage the environment. d: There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan. which one?
The fact on which the two sources disagree is:
c: Recycling programs in schools damage the environment.