Which of these pieces of evidence would be most important for jurors to consider in the case of Snoozer v. Early?
a Dibeast has lunch every week with Ms. Snoozer and trains her birds.
b Dibeast saw the birds on Early's property the day the birds went missing.
c Dibeast is an animal control officer who often has to capture Ms. Snoozer's birds.
d Dibeast witnessed that Early's cat was trained and well behaved.
The most important piece of evidence for jurors to consider in the case of Snoozer v. Early would be:
b) Dibeast saw the birds on Early's property the day the birds went missing.
This piece of evidence directly connects Early to the birds on the day they went missing, suggesting a potential involvement in their disappearance. The other pieces of evidence either don't directly relate to the case or are not as significant in determining Early's potential guilt or innocence.