Wolves are considered Response area because they are a species that other plants and animals within an ecosystem largely depend on. They are also Response area predators (predators at the top of the food chain) and greatly influence their environment. The Response area of wolves from the ecosystem would drastically change and possibly collapse the ecosystem because no other species is able to fill the wolves' ecological niche.
Wolves are considered keystone species because they play a critical role in maintaining the balance and structure of their ecosystems. As top predators, they help regulate the populations of prey species, preventing overgrazing and maintaining the health of plant populations.
When wolves are removed from an ecosystem, there can be a cascading effect on various other plant and animal species. For example, without wolves preying on herbivores like deer, their populations can increase rapidly, leading to excessive browsing on vegetation. This can cause a decline in plant diversity and disrupt the habitat for other species, including small mammals and birds that rely on specific plant species.
Additionally, the presence of wolves can alter the behavior of their prey species, which in turn affects the landscape. For instance, deer may avoid certain areas where wolves are known to hunt, allowing vegetation in those areas to recover and create more diverse habitats for other species.
In summary, the removal of wolves from an ecosystem can have significant repercussions, leading to imbalances and potentially the collapse of the ecosystem as other species fail to adequately fill their ecological niche.
Wolves are considered keystone species because they are a species that other plants and animals within an ecosystem largely depend on. They are also __________ predators (predators at the top of the food chain) and greatly influence their environment. The _________ of wolves from the ecosystem would drastically change and possibly collapse the ecosystem because no other species is able to fill the wolves' ecological niche.
Wolves are considered apex predators (predators at the top of the food chain) and greatly influence their environment. The removal of wolves from the ecosystem would drastically change and possibly collapse the ecosystem because no other species is able to fill the wolves' ecological niche.
When the last remaining wolf pups in Yellowstone were killed in 1924, it started a top-down process called a Response area, which is an ecological process that starts at the top of the food chain and affects other organisms all the way down the food change. This is a change that results from the the removal of an ecosystem's Response area predators or Response area.
When the last remaining wolf pups in Yellowstone were killed in 1924, it started a top-down process called a trophic cascade, which is an ecological process that starts at the top of the food chain and affects other organisms all the way down the food chain. This is a change that results from the removal of an ecosystem's top predators or apex predators.
wrong
I apologize for the incorrect response. The term you are referring to is "trophic cascade." A trophic cascade is a phenomenon in which changes at the top of the food chain, such as the removal or reintroduction of a top predator, have cascading effects on the entire ecosystem, impacting multiple trophic levels. Removing the apex predators, like wolves, can disrupt the balance and structure of the ecosystem, leading to significant changes in the populations of other species and potentially causing the collapse of the ecosystem.
. Taking what you learned about the wolves in Yellowstone, if all wolves were suddenly removed from the imaginary island mentioned in #2-#10, what would happen to the deer population?
(1 point)
Responses
The deer population would probably grow like it did prior to 2010 until starvation and disease began to limit the population similar to how the deer affected Yellowstone before the wolves were reintroduced.
The deer population would probably grow like it did prior to 2010 until starvation and disease began to limit the population similar to how the deer affected Yellowstone before the wolves were reintroduced.
The deer population would probably stay the same because predators are not important and have no affect on the other biotic and abiotic factors in an ecosystem.
The deer population would probably stay the same because predators are not important and have no affect on the other biotic and abiotic factors in an ecosystem.
The deer population would probably shrink like it did from 2012 to 2016 because predators are not important and trophic cascades do not exist.
The deer population would probably shrink like it did from 2012 to 2016 because predators are not important and trophic cascades do not exist.