Write a short, informative, and respectful response/comment to this...
Article 2 of the Constitution states there are three legal requirements for presidential eligibility, they are: 35 years or older, have lived within the U.S. for at least 14 years, and must be a natural-born citizen. A natural-born citizen means to have been born within U.S. borders, military bases, or extended territories. These are basic requirements and I don't think they should be changed to reflect today's demographics and education of American voters, perhaps they could be expanded upon though. In relation to demographics and the U.S. being a land of immigrants I could see how that requirement can seem outdated. However, I think the requirement should stay because the issue of citizenship is important in relation to loyalty. When someone is born in one country, whether they immigrate to another country or not, that person has a connection to their birth country, it is part of their identity and there could be issue of loyalty. The office of president should be held by someone with no doubt a commitment and loyalty to the U.S. and its constitution. If anything, I think that the requirement of natural-born citizen could be expanded upon to include potential candidates not holding dual citizenship with another country, because this brings up the issue of loyalty as well. In relation to education I think a potential candidate should undergo an IQ test of some sort. Not so much to be a restriction to eligibility, like needing a college degree of some sort, but in relation to basic comprehension of our country, our government, our economy, the duties of the office, including the world and how we and it relates to each other. An IQ test or a cognitive screening could bring forward favorable candidates because the presidency is an important office to hold and we as Americans should strive for the best. I think with the internet and information at our fingertips American voters would appreciate an intellectual president.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the requirements for presidential eligibility. It is true that Article 2 of the Constitution outlines the current requirements, including being 35 years or older, having lived in the U.S. for at least 14 years, and being a natural-born citizen. While some argue that these requirements should be updated to reflect today's demographics and education levels, you believe they should remain in place due to the importance of citizenship and loyalty.
You make a valid point about citizens having a connection to their birth country and the potential issue of loyalty. It is essential for the President to have a strong commitment to the U.S. and its constitution. Additionally, you suggest expanding the requirement of natural-born citizen to include candidates who do not hold dual citizenship to avoid any conflicts of loyalty, which is an interesting idea to consider.
Regarding education, you propose the idea of potential candidates undergoing an IQ test or cognitive screening to assess their understanding of our country, government, economy, and global relations. While not necessarily a requirement for eligibility, this could help identify highly knowledgeable and competent candidates for the presidency.
Overall, you believe that the presidency is a vital role that should be held by someone with a strong commitment, loyalty, and intellectual capabilities. With the abundant access to information through the internet, you suggest that American voters would appreciate having an intellectually capable president. Thank you for sharing your perspective on this topic.