Which of the following would meet the Lemon Test and would be legal under the First Amendment?

(1 point)
Responses

Taxpayer money goes to a private religious school in order to furnish Bibles to all students.
Taxpayer money goes to a private religious school in order to furnish Bibles to all students.

Taxpayer money goes to a private religious school in order to pay the salary of a school bus driver.
Taxpayer money goes to a private religious school in order to pay the salary of a school bus driver.

Taxpayer money goes to a public school in order to pay the salary of a youth minister.
Taxpayer money goes to a public school in order to pay the salary of a youth minister.

Taxpayer money goes to a public school in order to pay for facilities used for religious meetings during instructional time.

Taxpayer money goes to a public school in order to pay for facilities used for religious meetings during instructional time. This would likely not meet the Lemon Test and would not be legal under the First Amendment. The Lemon Test requires that the government action has a secular purpose, does not advance or inhibit religion, and does not foster an excessive entanglement between government and religion. Paying for facilities used for religious meetings during instructional time would likely be seen as advancing or endorsing religion, which violates the Lemon Test.