Our town should double its fines for speeding. Studies show that higher fines result in less speeding, so increasing the fees should improve safety. There is no reason not to do this. If people can afford to pay a $50 fine, then surely they should be able to pay a $100 fine as well.
How sound is the reasoning given to support the claim “Our town should double its fines for speeding”? Explain your response in 3 sentences.
The reasoning provided to support the claim is not entirely sound. While studies may suggest a correlation between higher fines and lower speeding rates, this does not necessarily mean that doubling the fines will automatically improve safety. Additionally, the assumption that if people can afford to pay a $50 fine, they can also pay a $100 fine is not necessarily accurate, as individuals' financial circumstances can vary widely. Therefore, more comprehensive research and analysis are needed to determine the effectiveness of doubling fines for speeding in improving safety.
only 3 sentances
The reasoning provided to support the claim is flawed. Correlation does not necessarily imply causation, and simply doubling fines may not guarantee improved safety. Additionally, assuming that those who can afford a $50 fine can also afford a $100 fine is an oversimplification of people's financial situations.
The reasoning presented to support the claim that the town should double its fines for speeding is not entirely sound. While the claim suggests that higher fines lead to less speeding, it does not necessarily follow that doubling the fines will have the desired effect. Additionally, the assumption that if someone can afford a $50 fine, they can also afford a $100 fine may not be accurate, as people's financial situations can vary greatly. Therefore, the reasoning lacks strong evidence and overlooks potential limitations, making it less convincing.
