What are the pros and cons of issue networks?(1 point) Responses The pros are that issue networks promote public interest. The cons are that they lack numbers, are prone to arguing, and their bonds are not as strong as the iron triangle and they lack public interest. The pros are that issue networks promote public interest. The cons are that they lack numbers, are prone to arguing, and their bonds are not as strong as the iron triangle and they lack public interest. The pros are that issue networks promote public interest and have strength in numbers. The cons are that their bonds are not as strong as the iron triangle and they’re prone to conflicts if they last too long. The pros are that issue networks promote public interest and have strength in numbers. The cons are that their bonds are not as strong as the iron triangle and they’re prone to conflicts if they last too long. The pros are that issue networks’ internal bonds are nearly as strong as the iron triangle. The cons are that they’re prone to conflicts if they last too long. The pros are that issue networks’ internal bonds are nearly as strong as the iron triangle. The cons are that they’re prone to conflicts if they last too long. The pros are that issue networks internal bonds are nearly as strong as the iron triangle. The cons are that they lack public interest, last too long, and are prone to conflicts.

Question

What are the pros and cons of issue networks?(1 point) Responses The pros are that issue networks promote public interest. The cons are that they lack numbers, are prone to arguing, and their bonds are not as strong as the iron triangle and they lack public interest. The pros are that issue networks promote public interest. The cons are that they lack numbers, are prone to arguing, and their bonds are not as strong as the iron triangle and they lack public interest. The pros are that issue networks promote public interest and have strength in numbers. The cons are that their bonds are not as strong as the iron triangle and they’re prone to conflicts if they last too long. The pros are that issue networks promote public interest and have strength in numbers. The cons are that their bonds are not as strong as the iron triangle and they’re prone to conflicts if they last too long. The pros are that issue networks’ internal bonds are nearly as strong as the iron triangle. The cons are that they’re prone to conflicts if they last too long. The pros are that issue networks’ internal bonds are nearly as strong as the iron triangle. The cons are that they’re prone to conflicts if they last too long. The pros are that issue networks internal bonds are nearly as strong as the iron triangle. The cons are that they lack public interest, last too long, and are prone to conflicts.

Answer 1

The pros of issue networks include promoting public interest and having strength in numbers. They bring together various organizations, interest groups, and individuals to advocate for a specific issue, increasing the chances of achieving desired outcomes. This collaboration also allows for diverse perspectives and expertise, leading to informed decision-making.

However, issue networks also have some cons. Firstly, they may lack numbers compared to other policy-making networks like the iron triangle, which can make it harder to gain influence and drive change. Secondly, due to the diverse nature of the members within an issue network, disagreements and conflicts can arise. This can hinder progress and compromise the effectiveness of the network. Finally, unlike the iron triangle that often focuses on narrow policy areas, issue networks may struggle with maintaining their momentum and public interest over time, especially if the issue remains unresolved or if conflicting priorities arise.

Answer 2

whats the answer

Answer 3

The answer is: The pros of issue networks include promoting public interest and having strength in numbers. The cons include lacking numbers compared to other networks, being prone to conflicts and disagreements, and their bonds not being as strong as the iron triangle.

Answer 4

The pros of issue networks are that they promote public interest and have strength in numbers. This means that they can effectively advocate for their causes and influence decision-making processes.

However, there are several cons associated with issue networks. Firstly, they lack numbers compared to other interest groups such as the iron triangle. This means they may struggle to gather enough support and resources to effectively push for their agenda.

Additionally, issue networks are prone to conflicts and arguments within the group. Since issue networks are composed of diverse stakeholders with varying perspectives, disagreements are common, which can hinder their effectiveness.

Furthermore, the bonds within issue networks are not as strong as those within the iron triangle. The iron triangle refers to the close relationship between interest groups, government agencies, and congressional committees, which often work together to shape policies. In contrast, the bonds within issue networks may be more temporary and may not have the same level of trust and cooperation.

Lastly, issue networks may also struggle to generate public interest and attention compared to other interest groups. This can limit their ability to mobilize public support and influence decision-makers.

In summary, while issue networks have the advantage of promoting public interest and can benefit from strength in numbers, their disadvantages include a lack of numbers, potential conflicts, weaker bonds compared to the iron triangle, and difficulty in gaining public attention.