An attorney might utilize peremptory challenges to remove a potential juror who exhibits prejudice or bias (option B). Peremptory challenges allow attorneys to dismiss potential jurors without providing a specific reason, as opposed to challenges for cause where a valid reason needs to be given. The purpose of peremptory challenges is to help attorneys shape the composition of the jury by eliminating individuals they believe may be partial or unsympathetic to their case. It is important to note that options A, C, and D explicitly mention discriminatory reasons that are not allowed for peremptory challenges based on the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Batson v. Kentucky.
