Use the arguments about the effects of video games on teenagers to answer the question.
Argument 1: Video games are fun, but they make teenagers less likely to engage in physical exercise.
Argument 2: Video games help teach teenagers to perform more than one task at the same time.
On which point do these two arguments disagree?
(1 point)
whether or not video games have any benefits for teenagers
whether or not video games have any benefits for teenagers
whether or not video games are a good substitute for exercise
whether or not video games are a good substitute for exercise
whether or not video games make teenagers more passive
whether or not video games make teenagers more passive
whether or not video games are fun for teenagers to play
The two arguments presented do not directly disagree on any of the specific points provided in the options. Both arguments concede that video games have some form of impact on teenagers, whether it be a negative impact on physical activity (Argument 1) or a positive impact on multitasking skills (Argument 2). However, none of the arguments specifically address the question of whether video games are a good substitute for exercise, make teenagers more passive, or their level of entertainment value.
If we have to choose an option that can be inferred as a point of disagreement based on the context, the closest one would be:
whether or not video games are a good substitute for exercise
This is because Argument 1 implies a negative effect on physical exercise due to video games, suggesting they are not a good substitute for exercise, while Argument 2 suggests a benefit of video games unrelated to physical activity. However, it's important to note that Argument 2 does not directly address exercise or propose video games as a substitute for it.