How does the final paragraph support the author's claim that being chosen as an Olympic host city improves the well-being of its residents?
What do Athens, Atlanta, and Tokyo have in common? They are all locations that have hosted the Olympic Games, the world's largest athletic competition. Every two years, cities around the world vie to bring athletes and entertainment to their corner of the world.
Originally, the host cities for the winter and summer games were selected based on what the city already offered for the athletes. Today, the host cities are selected through a much different process.
First, the city must prove that it is big enough to host the volume of athletes and spectators. Next, the city must convince its taxpayers that the income from the Olympics will offset the expenses necessary to build any additional structures for competition locations and lodging. Finally, the city must prove its worth as a positive presence on the world's stage.
Hosting the Olympics comes with a large price tag. If the games are so expensive, why do cities want to host the Olympics? Cities are able to show pride in their country, employ people to improve infrastructure, and profit from the tourism dollars added to the community.
To provide an accurate response, I would need to see the actual content of the final paragraph and the broader context within the article or essay in question. However, I can describe in general terms how a final paragraph might support the author's claim that being chosen as an Olympic host city improves the well-being of its residents:
1. **Summarizing Evidence**: The final paragraph might summarize key points of evidence presented throughout the article that supports the claim, such as infrastructure improvements, economic benefits, job creation, or increased tourism that may contribute to the residents' well-being.
2. **Highlighting Long-term Benefits**: The conclusion might emphasize the lasting impact of hosting the Olympics, such as urban renewal, better sports facilities for the community, or improved international reputation, which can lead to a sustained increase in the quality of life.
3. **Addressing Counterarguments**: The author may use the final paragraph to refute potential counterarguments, reinforcing their claim by showing that the positive outcomes for residents outweigh any negative aspects of hosting the games.
4. **Presenting Anecdotal Evidence**: The conclusion might include anecdotal evidence from residents who have experienced direct benefits from the games, making the impact on well-being more tangible and relatable for readers.
5. **Emphasizing Consensus**: The last paragraph could mention agreements or statements from experts or locals that support the idea of improved well-being, giving the claim more credibility.
6. **Appealing to Emotions**: The author might use emotive language or imagery in the final paragraph to create a vivid picture of community pride and happiness as a result of hosting the games.
7. **Citing Post-Event Data**: If there is post-Olympic data available, it could be included in the conclusion to show measurable improvements in the standard of living or other well-being indicators for residents.
Remember that without the actual text, these are just examples of how a final paragraph might generally support a claim about the positive effects of hosting the Olympics on a city's residents. If you have the specific text from the final paragraph, please share it for a more detailed analysis.