How the Supreme Court decision in planned parenthood v Casey support the tenth amendment
It gave women more right to privacy
It reserved certain powers for state government
It kept doctors in charge medical decisions
It made some crimes punishable by the government
The Supreme Court decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey does not directly support the Tenth Amendment, as it primarily focused on the constitutional right to privacy and a woman's right to choose whether or not to have an abortion. Nevertheless, certain aspects of the decision could be argued to indirectly support the principles of federalism and the authority of state governments.
1. It reserved certain powers for state government: The decision affirmed the right of states to implement regulations on abortion as long as they did not place an "undue burden" on women seeking an abortion. This recognition of state authority aligns with the principles of federalism that the Tenth Amendment represents.
2. It kept doctors in charge of medical decisions: The decision upheld the right of doctors to make decisions in the best interest of their patients, including providing relevant medical information and counseling. This recognition of the professional judgment of doctors could be seen as a defense of states' authority to regulate the medical profession within their boundaries.
3. It made some crimes punishable by the government: This point is not directly related to the Tenth Amendment or the Supreme Court decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. However, it is worth noting that certain criminal acts related to abortion, such as performing illegal abortions, could potentially be within the jurisdiction of state governments, which is consistent with the Tenth Amendment's reservation of powers to the states.
Overall, while the decision primarily focuses on individual rights and the scope of government regulation, some aspects of it indirectly support the principles of federalism and the authority of state governments.