Use the story summary to answer the question.
Two close friends, Nell and Hamish, are competing against each other in a tournament. They are evenly matched in skill, and it becomes apparent that they will both make it to the final round. However, Hamish is accused of cheating in the semifinals by one of his opponents. Nell has proof that Hamish couldn’t have cheated. However, allowing Hamish to be disqualified would make Nell the winner of the tournament by default.
If the story’s theme is about good sportsmanship, what would be the most logical conclusion to this story?
(1 point)
Responses
Nell does something to get disqualified from the tournament as well.
Nell does something to get disqualified from the tournament as well.
Nell refuses to speak up in defense of Hamish and wins the tournament.
Nell refuses to speak up in defense of Hamish and wins the tournament.
Nell exposes the lie and proves that Hamish is innocent, allowing the friends to compete against each other.
Nell ex…
poses the lie and proves that Hamish is innocent, allowing the friends to compete against each other.
What is the correct answer
The correct answer is:
Nell exposes the lie and proves that Hamish is innocent, allowing the friends to compete against each other.
To answer this question, we can refer to the story summary and identify the theme of good sportsmanship. In this case, good sportsmanship would involve fairness, honesty, and integrity in the competition.
Given this theme, the most logical conclusion to the story would be for Nell to expose the lie and prove that Hamish is innocent, allowing the friends to compete against each other. This option demonstrates good sportsmanship because Nell acts with integrity by standing up for her friend and ensuring that the competition remains fair.