To analyze a text, you look closely at the details. When reading informational texts, you will sometimes find conflicting information on a topic. In this portfolio, you will analyze two articles about the same topic: “Genetically Modified Salmon Can Feed The World” by Yonathan Zohar and “Say No To Genetically Engineered Salmon” by Rick Moonen (click on the article titles to access PDFs of the texts).
PORTFOLIO PROMPT (Unit 7, Lesson 9)
Now it’s time to complete your Portfolio. Use all of your analysis from the previous lessons to help you write your essay. Please follow the format below to write 3 paragraphs about these texts:
Paragraph One
Write a paragraph in which you describe the steps that experienced readers can use to analyze conflicting information in texts about the same topic. Explain why it is important for readers to recognize and evaluate conflicting information. Provide specific examples from the two texts.
Paragraph Two
Write a paragraph in which you explain why it matters when the two authors interpret the same facts differently. Using specific examples from the two texts, describe the impact of the authors’ differing interpretations of the facts on you as a reader.
Paragraph Three
Write a paragraph in which you explain how including a conflicting point of view and evidence in an argument can make it more persuasive. Describe the effect that including a conflicting point of view and evidence can have on readers. Give specific examples.
Paragraph One: Experienced readers can analyze conflicting information in texts about the same topic by carefully examining the sources, checking for bias and credibility, and comparing the evidence provided. It is important for readers to recognize and evaluate conflicting information because it enables them to form a well-rounded and informed opinion on the topic. In the case of the two texts, “Genetically Modified Salmon Can Feed The World” and “Say No To Genetically Engineered Salmon,” readers can analyze the conflicting information by comparing the evidence presented by the authors. For example, Zohar presents scientific studies and evidence supporting the idea that genetically modified salmon can help alleviate food shortages. On the other hand, Moonen argues against genetically engineered salmon, raising concerns about the potential environmental and health risks.
Paragraph Two: When authors interpret the same facts differently, it impacts the readers by shaping their understanding and perspective on the topic. In the case of the two texts, the differing interpretations of the facts by Zohar and Moonen influence readers' views on genetically modified salmon. Zohar's interpretation of the facts leans towards the benefits of genetically modified salmon, emphasizing its potential to solve the global food crisis. This interpretation may convince readers that genetically modified salmon is a viable solution. On the other hand, Moonen's interpretation highlights the potential risks and negative consequences of genetically engineered salmon. This perspective may sway readers to be more cautious and skeptical about the use of genetically modified salmon. As a reader, these contrasting interpretations make it necessary to critically analyze the evidence and form an opinion based on a balanced evaluation of both perspectives.
Paragraph Three: Including a conflicting point of view and evidence in an argument can make it more persuasive by demonstrating that the author has considered alternative perspectives and addressed potential counterarguments. When conflicting viewpoints and evidence are presented, it shows readers that the author has thoroughly researched the topic and understands its complexities. This can help build credibility and trust with the readers. In the case of the two texts, Zohar could strengthen his argument for genetically modified salmon by acknowledging and addressing the concerns raised by Moonen. By doing so, Zohar would show readers that he has considered both sides of the debate and is presenting a well-rounded argument. Similarly, Moonen could enhance his argument by acknowledging the potential benefits and citing cases where genetically modified salmon has been successfully implemented. Including a conflicting point of view and evidence allows readers to weigh the arguments and form their own informed opinion on the topic.