Why might an attorney utilize peremptory challenges?(1 point)
Responses
to remove a potential juror based on race
to remove a potential juror based on race
to remove a potential juror based on their residence in the community
to remove a potential juror based on their residence in the community
to remove a potential juror based on gender
to remove a potential juror based on gender
to remove a potential juror who exhibits prejudice or bias
to remove a potential juror who exhibits prejudice or bias
The main reason an attorney might utilize peremptory challenges is to remove potential jurors who they believe may be biased or have a prejudice that could affect the outcome of the trial.
a b c or d
The correct response is:
to remove a potential juror who exhibits prejudice or bias.
An attorney might utilize peremptory challenges for several reasons. Peremptory challenges allow attorneys to remove potential jurors without having to provide a specific reason. Here are a few possible reasons why an attorney might utilize peremptory challenges:
1. To remove a potential juror based on race: Unfortunately, in some cases, attorneys may want to choose jurors based on their race, believing that certain racial backgrounds might be more favorable to their case. However, it is worth noting that using peremptory challenges to remove jurors based solely on race is unconstitutional and in violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
2. To remove a potential juror based on their residence in the community: Attorneys might want to remove potential jurors who live in the community where the trial is taking place due to concerns about bias or familiarity. They may believe that jurors with close ties to the community might be predisposed to have preconceived notions that could impact their impartiality.
3. To remove a potential juror based on gender: In some cases, attorneys might utilize peremptory challenges to remove potential jurors based on their gender. They may believe that jurors of a particular gender might have biases or tendencies that could be detrimental to their case. However, it is important to note that using peremptory challenges based on gender is also subject to legal scrutiny and may not be allowed in many jurisdictions.
4. To remove a potential juror who exhibits prejudice or bias: One of the most common and legitimate reasons for utilizing peremptory challenges is to remove potential jurors who exhibit clear signs of prejudice or bias. Attorneys want to ensure that the jury is made up of individuals who can consider the evidence objectively and make impartial decisions. If a potential juror shows any indication of bias, such as making prejudiced remarks or admitting to having personal connections to the case, an attorney might use a peremptory challenge to remove them from the jury pool.
It is important to note that the reasons for utilizing peremptory challenges can vary depending on the specific case, jurisdiction, and legal considerations. The examples provided above are not an exhaustive list and should not be considered legal advice. Attorneys must exercise peremptory challenges within the confines of the law and not engage in discriminatory practices.