Vacant and abandoned homes dot the landscape of many cities across America. Many people believe that these homes result in high costs for policing, inspections, and, ultimately, demolition. However, while these empty structures present community challenges, they are potential properties for hope and revitalization. Communities can fill in the holes and rebuild neighborhoods using innovative approaches. After demolition, for example, empty lots can be turned into spaces for urban farms and community gardens.%0D%0A%0D%0AHow is the author’s position on revitalizing a city unique?%0D%0A%0D%0A(1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0AThe author expresses little hope for cities with dilapidated structures.%0D%0AThe author expresses little hope for cities with dilapidated structures.%0D%0A%0D%0AThe author offers examples of how to better a community by beautifying areas of previous destruction.%0D%0AThe author offers examples of how to better a community by beautifying areas of previous destruction.%0D%0A%0D%0AThe author encourages cities to make a plan for tearing down homes that are dangerous for the community.%0D%0AThe author encourages cities to make a plan for tearing down homes that are dangerous for the community.%0D%0A%0D%0AThe author explains why vacant and abandoned structures result in lost revenue for a city.

The author offers examples of how to better a community by beautifying areas of previous destruction.