Which option describes an opposing claim in an informational text?(1 point)

Responses

an argument that is counter to the claims an author makes
an argument that is counter to the claims an author makes

an argument that is made in order to contradict the argument made by the author
an argument that is made in order to contradict the argument made by the author

a claim made by the reader after analyzing the evidence presented
a claim made by the reader after analyzing the evidence presented

a claim made based on evidence presented by the author to support an argument

an argument that is counter to the claims an author makes

How can text features help a reader analyze an author's argument?(1 point)

Responses

They highlight opposing claims and evidence that might counter the argument.
They highlight opposing claims and evidence that might counter the argument.

They include examples and reasons that support the argument not found in the main text.
They include examples and reasons that support the argument not found in the main text.

They reveal the main points and show how factual support for the argument is organized.
They reveal the main points and show how factual support for the argument is organized.

They show where the most important information about the argument is located.

They reveal the main points and show how factual support for the argument is organized.

The correct option that describes an opposing claim in an informational text is "an argument that is made in order to contradict the argument made by the author." This means that it is a claim or argument that goes against or opposes the claims that an author presents in their text. To identify an opposing claim, you would need to analyze the text and look for arguments or claims that directly challenge or contradict the main points or claims made by the author.