Why did Southerners resist the increased tariff in 1828, arguing it should be nullified?
(1 point)
Responses
It was not helpful to any section of the country.
It was not helpful to any section of the country.
It benefited one section of the country at the expense of another.
It benefited one section of the country at the expense of another.
It increased the market for cotton.
It increased the market for cotton.
It increased foreign competition.
It increased foreign competition.
The primary reason why Southerners resisted the increased tariff in 1828 and argued for its nullification was because they believed it benefited one section of the country (the Northern industrial states) at the expense of another (the Southern agricultural states). The tariff raised the prices of imported manufactured goods, which the South relied on heavily, while also decreasing the demand for Southern exports such as cotton. Additionally, the tariff increased foreign competition for Southern exports, making it harder for Southern planters to sell their cotton on the international market.
once again, this isnt one of the answer choices...
I apologize for the confusion. Based on the given answer choices, the reason why some Southerners resisted the increased tariff in 1828 and argued for its nullification was that it benefited one section of the country at the expense of another. By increasing tariffs on imported goods, the Northern industrial states benefited from protectionism and increased market share, while the Southern agricultural states faced higher prices for manufactured goods and decreased demand for their exports. This unequal impact led to Southerners opposing the tariff and advocating for its nullification.
Southerners resisted the increased tariff in 1828 because they believed it was not helpful to their section of the country and argued that it should be nullified. The tariff was seen as benefiting one section of the country, specifically the Northern industrial states, at the expense of the Southern agricultural states.
To understand why Southerners believed the tariff was not helpful to their section, we need to examine its impact. The tariff increased the cost of imported goods that the South relied on, such as manufactured goods and agricultural equipment. This made it more expensive for Southerners to purchase these goods, cutting into their profits and increasing the cost of living.
Additionally, the increased tariff hurt the southern economy by reducing the market for their main cash crop, cotton. The South relied heavily on exporting cotton to Europe, but the tariff made it more expensive for European countries to buy southern cotton. This reduced demand for southern cotton and lowered prices, negatively affecting southern farmers and the overall economy of the region.
Moreover, the increased tariff also increased foreign competition for southern products. As the tariff made imported goods more expensive, it incentivized other countries to produce those goods domestically, reducing the demand for southern agricultural products both domestically and internationally.
It is important to note that these arguments against the tariff and calls for nullification were part of the larger tension between the Northern and Southern states over economic interests and states' rights. This dispute eventually led to the Nullification Crisis of 1832, where South Carolina threatened to secede from the Union over the issue of the tariff.