Why is there a historical debate surrounding the Great Wall of China?

(1 point)
Responses

The Great Wall was successful at keeping invaders out, but it was a costly project to build.

The Great Wall was successful at keeping invaders out, but it was a costly project to build.

The emperor's advisors refused to build the Great Wall although it proved to be a success.

The emperor's advisors refused to build the Great Wall although it proved to be a success.

The cruelty of the emperor caused suffering although the Great Wall was an achievement in defense.

The cruelty of the emperor caused suffering although the Great Wall was an achievement in defense.

The Great Wall today is considered an eyesore, although it was necessary in the emperor's time.

The Great Wall of China, while being an impressive structure, has sparked a historical debate due to various reasons. One of the reasons for debate is the cost associated with building the Great Wall. While it was effective at keeping invaders out, some argue that the resources spent on its construction could have been put to better use. Additionally, there is debate surrounding the role of the emperor's advisors in the decision to build the Great Wall. Some suggest that they refused to build it, despite its proven success, which adds to the controversy. Another aspect of the debate revolves around the emperor's cruelty and the suffering caused by his reign, despite the Great Wall being considered a remarkable achievement in defense. Lastly, there are differing opinions on the aesthetics of the Great Wall today. While it was necessary during the emperor's time, some consider it to be an eyesore in the present day.