At the Constitutional Convention, two plans were proposed for what form the new national government should take. Describe how the Great Compromise tried to address the concerns of small and large states.(1 point)
1. Sherman proposed the creation of changing the Articles of Confederation with the Bill of Rights. This pleased the Federalists and Anti-Federalists.
2. Sherman proposed the creation of a two-house legislature (members of the House of Representatives would be elected by popular vote), members of the Senate would be chosen by state legislatures, and each state would have two senators.
3. Sherman proposed that large states could be slave states and small states could be free states.
4. Sherman proposed that George Washington would govern the small and large states. Therefore, states did not have to govern themselves.
The statement provided contains some inaccuracies. Let me revise and clarify:
The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, was proposed by Roger Sherman at the Constitutional Convention. It aimed to address the concerns of both small and large states. Here is how it did so:
1. Bicameral Legislature: One key aspect of the Great Compromise was the proposal for a two-house legislature. This satisfied the large states' desire for representation based on population, while also ensuring the small states were not completely overshadowed. In the lower house, the House of Representatives, the number of representatives would be determined by population, giving larger states more representation. In the upper house, the Senate, each state would have equal representation with two senators, regardless of size. This compromise balanced the interests of both small and large states.
2. Equal Representation in the Senate: By granting each state, regardless of size, an equal number of senators, the Great Compromise ensured that small states would have a significant say in the legislative process. This alleviated the fears of smaller states that they would be marginalized by larger states and their interests ignored.
3. Proportional Representation in the House: On the other hand, the Great Compromise also recognized the demands of large states for representation based on their population. By allocating the number of representatives in the House of Representatives according to the population of each state, this compromise offered a mechanism for larger states to have a greater say in the legislative process.
In summary, the Great Compromise effectively addressed the concerns of small and large states by creating a two-house legislature with proportional representation in the House and equal representation in the Senate. This balanced approach sought to ensure that both small and large states had a voice in the new national government.