In 3–5 sentences, hypothesize what problems would have arisen if the elastic clause had not been included in the Constitution. Your answer should also include a critique of the Framers’ decision to include the elastic clause in the Constitution. Your response should consider the following: a thesis statement and one piece of evidence that supports your claim, and reasoning that explains how your evidence backs up your claim.(4 points)
If the elastic clause had not been included in the Constitution, there would have potentially been a lack of flexibility and adaptability in implementing necessary laws and policies. The clause grants the federal government the power to make all laws that are necessary and proper for carrying out its responsibilities, thus allowing for necessary adjustments as the country evolves. This can be supported by the fact that without the elastic clause, significant and timely action in response to unforeseen circumstances may be hindered or even prohibited. However, one critique of the Framers' decision to include the elastic clause is that it grants broad powers to the federal government, potentially infringing on state sovereignty and creating an imbalance of power between the federal and state governments.
