Cautionary Tale" and "An Island of Questions" differ from each other?

(1 point)

In "Easter Island: A Cautionary Tale," it says Europeans brought diseases that harmed people on Easter Island, but "An Island of Questions" says Europeans never came there.

"Easter Island: A Cautionary Tale" gives answers to the island's mysteries, while "An Island of Questions" only asks questions.

"Easter Island: A Cautionary Tale" tells us how the island got its name from a European explorer and talks about their influence, but "An Island of Questions" doesn't mention European exploration.

In "Easter Island: A Cautionary Tale," it says the forests disappeared because people cut down all the trees to move the statues, but "An Island of Questions" blames rats, who ate seeds that would have helped new trees grow.

The main difference between "Easter Island: A Cautionary Tale" and "An Island of Questions" is that the former provides explanations and answers to the mysteries surrounding Easter Island, while the latter presents itself as a collection of unanswered questions. Additionally, "Easter Island: A Cautionary Tale" discusses the impact of European exploration and the diseases brought by Europeans, whereas "An Island of Questions" does not mention any European influence on the island. In terms of the disappearance of the forests, "Easter Island: A Cautionary Tale" attributes it to human activity, specifically the cutting down of trees to move the statues, while "An Island of Questions" points to rats as the culprits, as they ate seeds that would have allowed new trees to grow.