Many people agree with zero-tolerance policies in schools. However, some people disagree with these policies. What is the MOST logical argument against having a zero-tolerance policy? (1 point) Responses Sometimes students should automatically be suspended if they make a bad choice. Sometimes students should automatically be suspended if they make a bad choice. Sometimes students deserve to be bullied or harassed by other classmates. Sometimes students deserve to be bullied or harassed by other classmates. Some students will go unpunished because they are not caught by a teacher. Some students will go unpunished because they are not caught by a teacher. Some students will be punished because they make an error that meant no harm
to anyone.
The most logical argument against having a zero-tolerance policy is that some students will be punished for making an error that meant no harm to anyone. This argument acknowledges that not all actions or choices made by students warrant severe punishments such as suspension or expulsion. There are instances where students may make minor mistakes or errors in judgment, but these actions do not cause harm to others or disrupt the learning environment. In such cases, a more lenient and individualized approach to discipline would be more fair and appropriate.