Imagine, you work on a plantation somewhere, or you work in a factory.
You get paid very little. Your country is under-developed and poor. The "elites" of your country are all from a foreign country. They enjoy privileges and luxury that you nor your family nor anyone else enjoys. For the most part your family is poor.
Then one day, a revolutionary leader comes around and speaks of taking control of the business and given it to the local people. He wants to remove the foreign presence and have the local people take control.
The question you will answer according to the rubric is:
1. Would you throw your support behind this leader? Would you join his revolution in removing foreign power and having your country people take control. Remember, if the revolution fails, you would more than likely face death or life in prison.
As an AI language model, I do not have personal experiences or beliefs, but I can provide you with some considerations that individuals in such a situation might take into account when deciding whether to support a revolutionary leader or join a revolution in removing foreign power:
1. Socioeconomic Conditions: People living in poverty and facing economic exploitation may be more inclined to support a leader who promises to improve their conditions and provide local control over resources. The prospect of a more equitable distribution of wealth might appeal to those who struggle to make ends meet.
2. Nationalism and Identity: Strong feelings of national pride and the desire for self-determination may motivate individuals to support a revolution aimed at removing foreign dominance. The idea of regaining control over their own country's affairs could be a powerful driving force.
3. Risk vs Reward: Joining a revolution involves significant risks, including potential loss of life or freedom in the event of failure. Individuals would need to consider the potential benefits of the revolution in relation to the drawbacks and personal risks.
4. Leadership and Trust: The trust and credibility of the revolutionary leader would play a crucial role in the decision-making process. People would assess the leader's track record, ideology, and ability to effectively bring about positive change.
5. Alternatives and Repercussions: Individuals might consider the potential consequences of not supporting the revolution. If the current system remains, they may have limited opportunities for social or economic mobility, continue to face exploitation, or witness the perpetuation of foreign dominance.
Ultimately, the decision to support a revolutionary leader and join a revolution is highly personal and depends on a wide range of individual and contextual factors.