Source 1: Requiring school districts to recycle will reduce the emissions of greenhouses gases that damage the environment. School districts have many people in them and dispose of large amounts of waste. Their participation is necessary recycling is going to have an impact on the environment.
Source 2: Outside recycling programs can be expensive for schools that need to use their districts money for educational programs and resourced. While recycling is important for protecting out planet, getting at students to follow a specific program is not easy and can cause programs to be ineffective.
On which fact do the two sources disagree/
Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.
Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.
There is a need to protect the environment with recycling.
There is a need to protect the environment with recycling.
The fact on which the two sources disagree is: "Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people."
Source 1 argues that school districts, which have many people and generate large amounts of waste, should be required to recycle in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and protect the environment. It implies that the participation of many people, specifically within school districts, is necessary for an effective recycling program.
On the other hand, Source 2 challenges this idea by stating that getting students to follow a specific recycling program is not easy and can cause programs to be ineffective. It suggests that despite the importance of recycling for protecting the planet, the participation of many people may not always result in successful recycling programs, especially within school settings.
Therefore, while both sources agree on the need to protect the environment through recycling, they disagree on the importance or effectiveness of requiring the participation of many people in order for recycling programs to be successful.