Compare how the Swahili coast of East Africa and the Kingdom of Kongo were impacted by their role global trade during the seventeenth century. (1 point)
• The Kingdom of Kongo moved north, while the Swahili coast disbanded.
O The Kingdom of Kongo and the Swahili coast were both destroyed.
The Kingdom of Kongo lost control of the slave trade, while the Swahili coast lost its power to extract resources.
Both the Kingdom of Kongo and the Swahili coast rose to greater prominence due to Portuguese involvement.
The Kingdom of Kongo and the Swahili coast were impacted differently by their role in global trade during the seventeenth century. While both regions experienced significant changes, the outcomes were distinct.
1. The Kingdom of Kongo lost control of the slave trade: In the seventeenth century, the Kingdom of Kongo was heavily involved in the transatlantic slave trade. Initially, they engaged in the trade by selling prisoners of war, criminals, and individuals convicted of witchcraft. However, with the arrival of the Portuguese in the fifteenth century, the Kingdom of Kongo became a major supplier of slaves. By the seventeenth century, European demand for slaves had increased, and this led to the collapse of Kongo's social and political structures. The kingdom was devastated by internal conflicts, depopulation, and the disintegration of its centralized authority.
2. The Swahili coast lost its power to extract resources: The Swahili coast, stretching from modern-day Somalia to Mozambique, had long been a hub of Indian Ocean trade. The arrival of the Portuguese in the late fifteenth century disrupted the existing trade networks dominated by the Swahili city-states. While the ports and cities along the Swahili coast initially tried to maintain control over their trade routes, they eventually lost their position of dominance. The Portuguese established their own trading posts and controlled key trading routes, diminishing the Swahili coast's power to extract resources and engage in international trade. As a result, the Swahili city-states disbanded, and their influence in global trade significantly declined.
3. Both the Kingdom of Kongo and the Swahili coast were impacted by Portuguese involvement: Portuguese involvement in the East African and Central African regions was a key factor in the changes experienced by both the Kingdom of Kongo and the Swahili coast. The Portuguese sought to establish trade networks, secure resources, and expand their influence. In their interactions with both regions, they brought new technologies, goods, and ideas, which had a profound impact on the local societies. While the Portuguese involvement led to the downfall of the Kingdom of Kongo and the dispersal of the Swahili city-states, it also resulted in increased integration into the global economy for a brief period of time.
In summary, the Kingdom of Kongo lost control of the slave trade and experienced internal conflicts and political disintegration, while the Swahili coast lost its power to extract resources and disbanded as a result of Portuguese interference. Despite these negative consequences, both regions initially rose to greater prominence due to Portuguese involvement before facing significant challenges.
The correct answer is: The Kingdom of Kongo lost control of the slave trade, while the Swahili coast lost its power to extract resources.
To compare how the Swahili coast of East Africa and the Kingdom of Kongo were impacted by their role in global trade during the seventeenth century, we need to analyze each region separately.
The Kingdom of Kongo, located in Central Africa, had a significant presence in the Atlantic slave trade during the 17th century. The arrival of the Portuguese in the late 15th century had initially brought wealth and new opportunities for the Kingdom. However, over time, this increased involvement in the slave trade led to negative consequences.
During the 17th century, the Kingdom of Kongo lost control of the slave trade. European powers, particularly the Portuguese, began to establish direct trading relationships with African coastal states and embarked on the transatlantic slave trade independently. This shift in power reduced the Kingdom of Kongo's influence on the slave trade and its ability to profit from it. This loss of control in global trade had a significant impact on the Kingdom of Kongo's economy and political stability.
On the other hand, the Swahili coast of East Africa experienced a different outcome in relation to global trade during the same period. The Swahili coast refers to the coastal region of East Africa that was involved in long-distance trade with other Indian Ocean regions, including the Middle East, India, and Southeast Asia.
In the 17th century, the Swahili coast's power and influence began to decline. The arrival of European powers, such as the Portuguese, disrupted the existing trade networks that the Swahili city-states had established with other regions. The Portuguese sought direct control over trade, bypassing the traditional Swahili middlemen. This led to the disbanding and weakening of the Swahili coast as a dominant trading force in the region.
Therefore, to answer the question, "Both the Kingdom of Kongo and the Swahili coast rose to greater prominence due to Portuguese involvement" is not correct. The correct answer is "The Kingdom of Kongo lost control of the slave trade, while the Swahili coast lost its power to extract resources." This answer accurately reflects how each region was impacted by their involvement in global trade during the seventeenth century.