Which of the following best explains the development of banana republics?

Countries allow for the creation of independent enclaves within its borders to take advantage of resources.
External economic influence and internal political corruption combine to exploit the resources of poor countries.
Powerful governments take political control of weaker countries to gain territory.
A powerful country conquers weaker neighbors to create buffer zones for its defense.

External economic influence and internal political corruption combine to exploit the resources of poor countries.

The best explanation for the development of banana republics would be:

External economic influence and internal political corruption combine to exploit the resources of poor countries.

To arrive at this answer, we can analyze the given options one by one:

1. Countries allow for the creation of independent enclaves within its borders to take advantage of resources.
This explanation is not the best option, as it does not capture the dynamics of external economic influence and internal corruption that are central to the development of banana republics.

2. External economic influence and internal political corruption combine to exploit the resources of poor countries.
This is the most accurate explanation. Banana republics typically emerge when external actors, such as multinational corporations or more prosperous countries, exert economic influence on a poor nation. Additionally, internal political corruption within the country allows these external actors to exploit its resources for their own gain.

3. Powerful governments take political control of weaker countries to gain territory.
While powerful governments might seek to gain control over weaker countries, this option does not specifically capture the exploitation of resources characteristic of banana republics.

4. A powerful country conquers weaker neighbors to create buffer zones for its defense.
This option focuses on the territorial motives behind powerful countries conquering weaker nations, but it does not address the economic exploitation of resources associated with banana republics.

In conclusion, option 2, "External economic influence and internal political corruption combine to exploit the resources of poor countries," best explains the development of banana republics.

The option that best explains the development of banana republics is: "External economic influence and internal political corruption combine to exploit the resources of poor countries."

Banana republics typically developed when external economic influences from powerful countries combined with internal political corruption within poorer countries. This combination allowed the exploitation of the resources and economies of these poor countries for the benefit of external powers or local elites.