Which statement best analyzes how gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation?(1 point)
Responses
Gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation because lawmakers can redraw districts before every election.
Gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation because lawmakers can redraw districts before every election.
Gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation because it creates voting districts that require people to vote for specific candidates.
Gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation because it creates voting districts that require people to vote for specific candidates.
Gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation because it makes people ineligible to vote.
Gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation because it makes people ineligible to vote.
Gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation because it gives an electoral advantage to a political party.
Gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation because it gives an electoral advantage to a political party.
The statement that best analyzes how gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation is: "Gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation because it gives an electoral advantage to a political party."
The correct statement that best analyzes how gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation is: "Gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation because it gives an electoral advantage to a political party."
To arrive at this answer, let's break down the options:
1. "Gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation because lawmakers can redraw districts before every election."
- This statement correctly identifies the practice of redrawing districts before every election as a way gerrymandering promotes partisan interests. However, it does not specifically mention the electoral advantage given to a political party.
2. "Gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation because it creates voting districts that require people to vote for specific candidates."
- This statement is incorrect. Gerrymandering does not create voting districts that require people to vote for specific candidates. Rather, it strategically redraws district boundaries to influence the outcome of elections.
3. "Gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation because it makes people ineligible to vote."
- This statement is incorrect. Gerrymandering does not directly make people ineligible to vote. It focuses on manipulating district boundaries for political advantage, rather than voter eligibility.
4. "Gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation because it gives an electoral advantage to a political party."
- This statement is correct. Gerrymandering is specifically designed to give one political party an advantage in elections. By manipulating district boundaries to concentrate or disperse certain types of voters, a party can secure more seats in Congress and maintain political control.
Therefore, the statement that best analyzes how gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation is: "Gerrymandering promotes partisan interests rather than fair congressional representation because it gives an electoral advantage to a political party."