Why might an attorney utilize peremptory challenges?(1 point)Responsesto remove a potential juror who exhibits prejudice or biasto remove a potential juror who exhibits prejudice or biasto remove a potential juror based on genderto remove a potential juror based on genderto remove a potential juror based on their residence in the communityto remove a potential juror based on their residence in the communityto remove a potential juror based on raceto remove a potential juror based on race
An attorney might utilize peremptory challenges in order to:
- Remove a potential juror who exhibits prejudice or bias
- Remove a potential juror based on gender
- Remove a potential juror based on their residence in the community
- Remove a potential juror based on race
In general, peremptory challenges allow attorneys to remove potential jurors they perceive as unfavorable or biased towards their case, helping to ensure a fair and impartial jury. However, it is important to note that there are restrictions on the use of peremptory challenges to prevent discriminatory practices.
An attorney might utilize peremptory challenges for a variety of reasons. One reason is to remove a potential juror who exhibits prejudice or bias. Another reason is to remove a potential juror based on their gender. Additionally, an attorney may use peremptory challenges to exclude a potential juror based on their residence in the community or their race. These challenges are a way for attorneys to shape the jury to their advantage and ensure a fair trial.
An attorney might utilize peremptory challenges in a trial for several reasons:
1. To remove a potential juror who exhibits prejudice or bias: Peremptory challenges allow attorneys to remove jurors who have shown any indication of being biased or prejudiced against their client or the case.
2. To remove a potential juror based on gender: Although it is generally prohibited to discriminate based on gender, attorneys may utilize peremptory challenges to maintain a balance of genders on the jury if they believe it is necessary for the fair presentation of their case.
3. To remove a potential juror based on their residence in the community: Attorneys may use peremptory challenges to dismiss jurors who they believe may have strong ties to the community where the trial is taking place. The concern here is that the juror's connections to the community may bias their judgment.
4. To remove a potential juror based on race: While the use of peremptory challenges based on racial discrimination is generally disallowed, there have been instances where attorneys have unjustly removed jurors based solely on their race. However, it is important to note that such discriminatory use of peremptory challenges is unconstitutional and goes against the principles of a fair trial.
To exercise peremptory challenges, attorneys typically need to provide no reason or explanation for dismissing a juror. However, there are limitations and restrictions in place to prevent the arbitrary or discriminatory use of peremptory challenges. Some jurisdictions may require attorneys to provide a nondiscriminatory reason if their use of peremptory challenges is challenged by the opposing party or the court.