Cleo is writing a research paper about why the dinosaurs died out. She is considering four pieces of evidence. Examine each piece of evidence, and then decide which two would be best to include in her paper. Select the two correct answers.
A.According to National Geographic, lava flows in India sent dangerous chemicals into the air 66 million years ago. These chemicals were strong enough to kill many living creatures.
B.Dinosaurs are a group of reptiles that lived millions of years ago. The word dinosaur was first used by a naturalist named Sir Richard Owen.
C.Modern birds are the closest living link to dinosaurs. That's because they share a common ancestor—the theropod. These were meat-eating dinosaurs. And they lived over 201 million years ago.
D.Some scientists believe dinosaurs died out after a meteor strike. Evidence of a huge meteor crash was found in Mexico in 2016. And the crash happened around the same time dinosaurs went extinct.
The two pieces of evidence that would be best to include in Cleo's research paper are A and D.
A. According to National Geographic, lava flows in India sending dangerous chemicals into the air 66 million years ago is a strong piece of evidence that could have contributed to the extinction of dinosaurs. This evidence suggests that the dangerous chemicals were strong enough to kill many living creatures.
D. The evidence of a huge meteor crash found in Mexico in 2016 and its timing coinciding with the extinction of dinosaurs is another important piece of evidence. This suggests that a meteor strike could have played a significant role in the extinction event.
The two best pieces of evidence to include in Cleo's research paper would be:
A.According to National Geographic, lava flows in India sent dangerous chemicals into the air 66 million years ago. These chemicals were strong enough to kill many living creatures.
D.Some scientists believe dinosaurs died out after a meteor strike. Evidence of a huge meteor crash was found in Mexico in 2016. And the crash happened around the same time dinosaurs went extinct.
In order to determine which two pieces of evidence would be best to include in Cleo's research paper about why the dinosaurs died out, let's examine each piece of evidence.
A. According to National Geographic, lava flows in India sent dangerous chemicals into the air 66 million years ago. These chemicals were strong enough to kill many living creatures. This piece of evidence suggests that dangerous chemicals released by lava flows in India could have been a contributing factor to the extinction of dinosaurs.
B. Dinosaurs are a group of reptiles that lived millions of years ago. The word dinosaur was first used by a naturalist named Sir Richard Owen. While this piece of evidence provides information about dinosaurs and their history, it does not directly explain why they died out.
C. Modern birds are the closest living link to dinosaurs. That's because they share a common ancestor—the theropod. These were meat-eating dinosaurs. And they lived over 201 million years ago. This piece of evidence highlights the connection between modern birds and dinosaurs, but it does not provide insight into the extinction of dinosaurs.
D. Some scientists believe dinosaurs died out after a meteor strike. Evidence of a huge meteor crash was found in Mexico in 2016. And the crash happened around the same time dinosaurs went extinct. This piece of evidence suggests that a meteor strike could have been the cause of the dinosaurs' extinction.
Based on the analysis of the four pieces of evidence, the two best choices to include in Cleo's research paper would be:
A. According to National Geographic, lava flows in India sent dangerous chemicals into the air 66 million years ago. These chemicals were strong enough to kill many living creatures. This evidence provides a potential cause for the extinction of dinosaurs, highlighting the impact of dangerous chemicals released by lava flows.
D. Some scientists believe dinosaurs died out after a meteor strike. Evidence of a huge meteor crash was found in Mexico in 2016. And the crash happened around the same time dinosaurs went extinct. This evidence supports the theory that a meteor strike could have played a significant role in the extinction of dinosaurs.
Including these two pieces of evidence in Cleo's research paper would provide a comprehensive analysis of potential causes for the extinction of dinosaurs.
This question has two parts. First, answer Part A. Then, answer Part B.
PART A
Read this passage from a news article. Then answer the question that follows.
The megalodon was a giant shark. It is extinct today. Scientists used fossils to learn more about it. They created a 3-D model of the megalodon. What did they learn? The megalodon was around 50 feet (16 meters) long. That's bigger than a school bus! It was also two to three times the size of today's great white shark. The megalodon's large jaw allowed it to feed on other big creatures. Once it filled its huge stomach, it could swim for months at a time.
Which question does this text answer?
A.How did the megalodon benefit from its size?
B.How did scientists discover megalodon fossils?
C.Why did the megalodon become extinct?
D.In which oceans did the megalodon mostly hunt?
PART B
Which two statements from the text support your answer to Part A?
A.The megalodon's large jaw allowed it to feed on other big creatures.
B.Scientists used fossils to learn more about it.
C.They created a 3-D model of the megalodon.
D.Once it filled its huge stomach, it could swim for months at a time.
PART A
The passage from the news article answers the question:
C.Why did the megalodon become extinct?
PART B
The two statements from the text that support the answer to Part A are:
A. The megalodon's large jaw allowed it to feed on other big creatures.
D. Once it filled its huge stomach, it could swim for months at a time.
These statements provide information about the megalodon's hunting and feeding capabilities, which can give insights into why it became extinct.
part a is wrong.
Apologies for the mistake. Upon reviewing the passage again, the correct answer to Part A is:
A. How did the megalodon benefit from its size?
Because coyotes are omnivores, __________.
A.they are welcome in classrooms
B.they are smart and crafty
C.they are good at sneaking around without being seen
D.they are able to find food easily in cities
D. they are able to find food easily in cities
Which passage from the article best supports the idea that coyotes are able to adapt?
A.Plus, coyotes can live alone, in pairs, or in packs. They adopt whichever strategy offers them the best chance at staying alive where they live.
B.In 2015, CNN reported that a coyote was spotted on a New York City rooftop.
C.According to National Geographic, coyotes' North American habitat has grown. It's increased by about 40 percent since the 1950s.
D.In other words, coyotes are smart…even though they're not allowed to hang around in classrooms.