Because of the use of value change in this image, th artist
(1 point)
was able to make the image have no contrast
was able to emphasize only one minute area of the drawing.
O was able to create the illusion of depth.
was able to create no difference in textures
was able to create the illusion of depth.
The correct answer is:
The artist was able to create the illusion of depth.
By utilizing value change in an image, an artist can accomplish various visual effects. In this particular case, the question states that the artist was able to achieve a certain outcome. Let's break down each given option to determine the correct answer.
1. "Was able to make the image have no contrast": This option implies that the artist used value change to eliminate contrast in the image. However, value change refers to the variation in tones from light to dark, so it is unlikely that value change would result in no contrast. Therefore, this option is unlikely to be the correct answer.
2. "Was able to emphasize only one minute area of the drawing": This choice suggests that the artist selectively emphasized a small area in the drawing using value change. Value change can be used to create focal points by manipulating the contrast between different areas. This option aligns well with the concept of using value change effectively, so it could be a potential correct answer.
3. "Was able to create the illusion of depth": Value change is a fundamental element in creating the illusion of depth in artworks. By skillfully rendering lighter and darker values, artists can imply a sense of space and three-dimensionality. Therefore, this option seems to be a reasonable choice as it accurately describes a common application of value change.
4. "Was able to create no difference in textures": Value change primarily deals with the variation of lightness and darkness in an artwork and is not directly related to the depiction of textures. Textures are typically achieved through other means such as brushstrokes or materials used. Consequently, this option seems unlikely to be the correct answer.
Considering the explanations above, option 2 ("Was able to emphasize only one minute area of the drawing") and option 3 ("Was able to create the illusion of depth") seem to be the most plausible answers. However, without additional information or visual context, it is difficult to determine the exact answer.