Why did many northerners object to the addition of Missouri as a state?
(1 point)
Responses
They wanted the territory reserved for Native Americans.
They wanted the territory reserved for Native Americans.
They believed the territory was illegally acquired.
They believed the territory was illegally acquired.
They objected to more land being opened for agriculture.
They objected to more land being opened for agriculture.
They feared another slave state would tip the political balance.
They feared another slave state would tip the political balance.
The main reason why many northerners objected to the addition of Missouri as a state was because they feared another slave state would tip the political balance. This objection stemmed from the ongoing debate surrounding the expansion of slavery and the balance of power between free states and slave states in Congress. The addition of another slave state was seen as potentially giving more political influence to slave-owning states and could potentially strengthen the institution of slavery.
The correct answer is: They feared another slave state would tip the political balance.
Many northerners objected to the addition of Missouri as a state because they feared it would result in an imbalance of power between slave states and free states in the United States Congress. To get this answer, one could study the historical context surrounding the Missouri Compromise of 1820. This compromise sought to maintain a balance between slave and free states by admitting Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state, while banning slavery in the rest of the Louisiana Territory north of the 36°30' parallel. Understanding this historical background and the debates surrounding it would lead to the conclusion that northerners objected to the addition of Missouri as a state due to concerns about the political balance.