Why was it so difficult for the government under the Articles of Confederation to get laws passed?

*
1 point
It was difficult to get 9 out of 13 states to agree on things because the leaders put their state before country
There was no executive branch, so there was no one to enforce the laws on the citizens
They could never get the delegates of all 13 colonies to come together to discuss and pass laws
It was not easy to get all 13 states to agree on things because the leaders always put their state before country

It was difficult to get 9 out of 13 states to agree on things because the leaders put their state before country.

The correct answer is: "It was difficult to get 9 out of 13 states to agree on things because the leaders put their state before country."

The correct answer is: It was difficult to get 9 out of 13 states to agree on things because the leaders put their state before country.

Under the Articles of Confederation, the government had a weak central authority and each state had its own independent government. In order to pass laws, the approval of at least 9 out of the 13 states was required. However, it was challenging to reach this consensus due to a variety of reasons.

One significant obstacle was that the leaders of each state often prioritized the interests of their own state over the good of the entire nation. This meant that they were hesitant to support legislation that might negatively impact their state, even if it could benefit the country as a whole.

Additionally, the lack of an executive branch in the government structure of the Articles of Confederation further complicated the process. Without an executive authority, there was no central figure or body responsible for enforcing the laws passed by the government. This weakened the authority and effectiveness of the government, making it more challenging to implement and enforce laws on the citizens.

In summary, the difficulty in getting laws passed under the government of the Articles of Confederation was primarily due to the competing interests and priorities of the state leaders, as well as the lack of a strong executive branch to enforce the laws.