By deviating from chronological structure in into the wild what did krakauer emphasize
he emphasized what things happened
he emphasized how things happened
he emphasized where things happened
he emphasized when things happened
In "Into the Wild," Jon Krakauer deviated from a chronological structure to emphasize how things happened and the reasons behind Christopher McCandless's journey and his tragic end. By using a non-linear narrative, Krakauer focused on exploring McCandless's internal thoughts, motivations, and experiences rather than simply recounting the events in a linear timeline. This allowed for a deeper understanding of McCandless's mindset and the impact his actions had on those he encountered along the way. Additionally, Krakauer emphasized the significance of the wild landscapes as a character in the story, highlighting the geographical locations and their influence on McCandless's journey. While Krakauer does mention when certain events happened, the emphasis lies more on the internal and emotional journey of McCandless rather than solely on the chronological timeline.
In "Into the Wild," author Jon Krakauer deviates from the chronological structure to emphasize how things happened and why they happened. He focuses on explaining the motivations and thought processes of the main character, Chris McCandless, as well as providing insight into the wilderness and the impact it had on him. While Krakauer does mention the where and when things happened, his primary emphasis lies in exploring the internal journey and experiences of McCandless.
In the book "Into the Wild" by Jon Krakauer, the author deviates from a strictly chronological structure to emphasize different aspects of the story. While all the elements you mentioned are important in understanding the narrative, Krakauer primarily emphasizes how things happened and why they happened.
1. "How things happened": By deviating from chronological order, Krakauer is able to highlight the sequence of events leading up to Chris McCandless' death and the choices he made. This approach allows readers to understand the motivations and thought processes behind McCandless' actions. Krakauer examines the circumstances surrounding McCandless' journey, his encounters with different people, and the challenges he faced. By exploring the "how," the author delves into the emotional and physical aspects of McCandless' experiences.
2. "Why things happened": Another aspect Krakauer emphasizes is the motivation behind McCandless' decision to live in the wilderness. The author provides insights into McCandless' idealism, the troubled relationship with his family, and his desire for solitude and freedom. Krakauer attempts to understand the deeper reasons for McCandless' unconventional choices and delves into the psychological and philosophical aspects of his journey.
While the "where" and "when" are also important elements in the narrative, Krakauer's primary focus is on exploring the "how" and "why" to offer a more comprehensive understanding of Chris McCandless' tragic adventure. By studying the actions, motivations, and consequences, Krakauer aims to shed light on the complex character of McCandless and the circumstances that led to his untimely death.