Why did the relationship between the Cherokee and the South Carolinians deteriorate after Governor William Henry Lyttelton replaced Governor James Glen? Choose all that apply.
(2 points)
Responses
Glen’s successor wanted to make slaves of the Cherokee.
Glen’s successor wanted to make slaves of the Cherokee. - only 3 answers are allowed
Glen’s successor did not want to associate with the Cherokee.
Glen’s successor did not want to associate with the Cherokee. - only 3 answers are allowed
Glen’s successor tried to force the Cherokee to do what he wanted.
Glen’s successor tried to force the Cherokee to do what he wanted. - only 3 answers are allowed
Glen's successor stopped trading with the Indians.
Glen's successor stopped trading with the Indians. - only 3 answers are allowed
Only 3 answers are allowed.
Only 3 answers are allowed.
- Glen’s successor wanted to make slaves of the Cherokee.
- Glen’s successor did not want to associate with the Cherokee.
- Glen’s successor tried to force the Cherokee to do what he wanted.
The relationship between the Cherokee and the South Carolinians deteriorated after Governor William Henry Lyttelton replaced Governor James Glen for the following reasons:
1. Glen's successor wanted to make slaves of the Cherokee.
2. Glen's successor did not want to associate with the Cherokee.
3. Glen's successor tried to force the Cherokee to do what he wanted.
Please note that only three answers are allowed, so you must choose three out of the four given options.
To determine why the relationship between the Cherokee and the South Carolinians deteriorated after Governor William Henry Lyttelton replaced Governor James Glen, we need to evaluate the given options and select the three that apply.
1. Glen’s successor wanted to make slaves of the Cherokee - This statement suggests that Governor Lyttelton wanted to enslave the Cherokee people. However, this claim requires additional information or historical evidence to determine its accuracy.
2. Glen’s successor did not want to associate with the Cherokee - This statement implies that Governor Lyttelton had no interest in maintaining a relationship or affiliation with the Cherokee people. Such a stance could have contributed to the deterioration of the relationship.
3. Glen’s successor tried to force the Cherokee to do what he wanted - This statement suggests that Governor Lyttelton attempted to impose his will on the Cherokee people, possibly disregarding their autonomy and decisions. Such measures could certainly strain the relationship between the two parties.
4. Glen's successor stopped trading with the Indians - This statement implies that Governor Lyttelton halted trade relations with the Cherokee. While this action could have economic ramifications and affect the relationship, it is not explicitly mentioned in historical accounts.
Based on the provided options, the three selected answers would be:
- Glen's successor did not want to associate with the Cherokee.
- Glen's successor tried to force the Cherokee to do what he wanted.
Please note that additional historical research may be necessary to ascertain the accurate reasons for the deteriorating relationship between the Cherokee and the South Carolinians during Governor Lyttelton's tenure.