Which of the following correctly analyzes the effect the Supreme Court’s use of selective incorporation has had on the freedom of expression?(1 point)
Selective incorporation had no effect on the freedom of expression as states have always had to protect the freedom of speech. Selective incorporation had no effect on the freedom of expression as states have always had to protect the freedom of speech. Selective incorporation has expanded the freedom of expression by forcing states to protect the freedom of speech. Selective incorporation has expanded the freedom of expression by forcing states to protect the freedom of speech. Selective incorporation has gradually reduced freedom of expression by allowing states to ignore certain freedoms found in the Bill of Rights. Selective incorporation has gradually reduced freedom of expression by allowing states to ignore certain freedoms found in the Bill of Rights. Selective incorporation has limited the freedom of expression by only requiring the national government to abide by the freedom of speech. Selective incorporation has limited the freedom of expression by only requiring the national government to abide by the freedom of speech.
The correct statement is: "Selective incorporation has expanded the freedom of expression by forcing states to protect the freedom of speech."
The correct answer is "Selective incorporation has expanded the freedom of expression by forcing states to protect the freedom of speech."
To understand this, let's first explain what selective incorporation is. Selective incorporation is a legal doctrine that allows the Supreme Court to apply protections from the Bill of Rights to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Bill of Rights originally only applied to the federal government, but through selective incorporation, certain rights have been extended to the states.
In the context of freedom of expression, selective incorporation has had a positive effect. Before selective incorporation, the freedom of speech guarantee in the First Amendment only applied directly to the federal government, not to the states. This meant that states had the power to restrict freedom of expression within their own jurisdictions.
However, with selective incorporation, the Supreme Court has gradually applied the First Amendment's freedom of speech protection to the states. This means that states are now required to protect and uphold the freedom of speech just like the federal government.
Therefore, the correct answer is that selective incorporation has expanded the freedom of expression by forcing states to protect the freedom of speech.