How did Texans work around Article 13?
A. They ignored the new laws in article 13
b. they asked the government to change its mind
c. they lied to the government about when enslaved people were born
d. They made the mexican government agree to honor labor contracts
Pick an option
C. They lied to the government about when enslaved people were born
To understand how Texans may have worked around Article 13, which relates to the abolition of slavery in Mexico, let's break down the options:
A. They ignored the new laws in article 13:
This option suggests that Texans simply disregarded the laws set by Article 13. However, this is unlikely to be an effective or sustainable strategy, as it would go against the legal framework established by the Mexican government.
B. They asked the government to change its mind:
While Texans could have expressed their opinions and concerns to the government in an attempt to influence or persuade them to reconsider Article 13, it would ultimately be up to the Mexican government to decide whether or not to revise the law.
C. They lied to the government about when enslaved people were born:
This option implies that Texans dishonestly misrepresented the birthdates of enslaved individuals to circumvent the law. While deception might have been employed by some individuals, it would have been challenging to sustain this strategy over time.
D. They made the Mexican government agree to honor labor contracts:
Option D suggests that Texans negotiated with the Mexican government to honor existing labor contracts. This approach could have been more realistic and productive for Texans. By proposing that labor contracts be respected, Texans may have sought to ensure that enslaved individuals would continue to work for their owners until the contractual obligations were fulfilled.
Considering these options, it is most feasible that Texans pursued option D, attempting to negotiate with the Mexican government to honor labor contracts to mitigate the impact of Article 13.